# | Fact Summary | 1st Trial (2024) Prosecution |
1st Trial (2024) Defense |
Retrial (2025) Prosecution |
Retrial (2025) Defense |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | John O’Keefe found dead outside 34 Fairview Rd, ~6 a.m., Jan 29, 2022, during snowstorm1 | Read reversed her Lexus, struck O’Keefe, left him in the snow1 | O’Keefe was beaten inside the house, body staged outside2 | Intentional strike; used Read's documentary statements as evidence1 | "More robust" defense case; focus on Proctor misconduct2 |
2 | Blunt-force head injuries, hypothermia, abrasions on right arm3 | Injuries match SUV collision3 | Pattern fits dog bites/assault, not car4 | Dr. Wolf: no jaw/facial fractures = fall, not assault3 | DiSogra expert: no SUV techstream events from collision4 |
3 | Broken Lexus taillight; matching plastic on lawn & clothes5 | Physical match proves Lexus strike5 | Fragments broke later or were planted6 | Same physical-match emphasis5 | Same planting/chain-of-custody attack6 |
4 | Vehicle data: reverse shift & 24 mph spike at 12:45 a.m.7 | Indicates purposeful, high-speed reverse7 | Data ambiguous; analyst unqualified8 | Same trooper testifies7 | Same criticisms; exclusion motion denied8 |
5 | Witnesses (EMT, Jen McCabe) heard Read say “I hit him”9 | Admission of guilt9 | She actually asked “Did I hit him?”10 | Same testimony repeated9 | Same rebuttal; witness credibility attacked10 |
6 | Google search “how long to die in cold”11 | 6:23 a.m. search at Read’s request11 | Actually 2:27 a.m.—shows prior knowledge12 | Second expert backs 6:24 a.m.11 | Defense still argues 2:27 a.m. artifact12 |
7 | Apple Health/Waze data from victim’s phone13 | Phone stayed in Lexus—supports car-strike13 | Step count shows he walked inside14 | Cell-site analyst: phone remained in yard13 | Defense still highlights step-count anomaly14 |
8 | Snow-plow driver saw no body on lawn15 | Visibility poor; observation inconclusive15 | Supports staging theory & contradicts timeline16 | State stresses color-blindness & snow15 | Defense same staging use16 |
9 | Evidence collected with leaf-blower, Solo cups, grocery bags17 | Rapid action justified by storm17 | Shows sloppy, biased police work18 | Officers reiterate same methods17 | Defense doubles down on contamination claim18 |
10 | 52 unanswered calls & 8 angry voicemails left by Read19 | Shows rage & jealousy motive19 | Shows frantic search; anger ≠ murder20 | Jurors hear audio for first time19 | Same counter-argument with alcohol context20 |
11 | Michael Proctor (lead investigator) fired between trials21 | Proctor testified for prosecution21 | Attacked his vulgar texts about Read21 | Proctor not called as witness21 | "Cancer that cannot be cut out"—Alan Jackson21 |
12 | Rice-sized plastic debris found in O'Keefe's clothing22 | Not previously highlighted22 | Not previously highlighted22 | Matches Read's taillight or "same characteristics"22 | Challenges chain of custody22 |
13 | SUV scuff mark matches O'Keefe's hip height23 | General damage testimony23 | General damage testimony23 | Dr. Welcher: precise height match analysis23 | Challenges expert methodology23 |
14 | Timeline discrepancy: 21-29 seconds between SUV and phone clocks24 | General timeline evidence24 | General timeline evidence24 | Device lock event at 12:31:43 a.m. shows collision24 | Clock discrepancy undermines precision24 |
15 | Jennifer McCabe emerged as central witness (3 days testimony)25 | Standard witness testimony25 | Standard cross-examination25 | Portrayed as reliable key witness25 | Painted as colluding in cover-up scheme25 |
16 | Defense crash reconstruction expert testimony26 | N/A (Not presented in first trial) | N/A (Not presented in first trial) | Challenged defense expert's methodology and conclusions | Andrew Rentschler testified O'Keefe's injuries inconsistent with being struck by a vehicle26 |
17 | Taillight evidence re-examination27 | Taillight fragments matched to O'Keefe's injuries | Fragments could have been planted or broken later | Maintained taillight evidence was crucial physical evidence | Defense expert testified 'no evidence' showing how taillight was broken27 |
18 | Closing arguments (June 12-13, 2025)28 | N/A (Different closing arguments) | N/A (Different closing arguments) | Argued Read was 'drunk, angry, and jealous' when she 'left O'Keefe to die'28 | Claimed investigation was 'flawed from the start' and prosecution failed to meet burden of proof29 |
19 | Jury instructions & deliberations30 | N/A (Different jury instructions) | N/A (Different jury instructions) | Judge instructed jury on second-degree murder, manslaughter, and leaving scene charges | Judge emphasized burden of proof and presumption of innocence30 |
Daily Trial Timeline - Karen Read Retrial 2025
Comprehensive day-by-day breakdown of witness testimony and key arguments from April 22 through June 18, 2025, covering 36 days of trial. The timeline includes the prosecution's case (Days 1-23), defense case (Days 24-30), closing arguments (Day 31), and jury deliberations (Days 32-35).
Case Outcome: Not Guilty of Murder, Convicted of OUI
Verdict Date: June 18, 2025
Charges and Findings:
- Acquitted: Second-degree murder, Manslaughter, Leaving the scene of an accident
- Convicted: Operating Under the Influence (OUI)
Sentence Imposed: 1 year probation, 24D alcohol education program
Jury Deliberation: 5 days (21+ hours, June 13-18, 2025)
Key Factors in the Verdict: The jury determined there was reasonable doubt regarding the fatal incident, leading to acquittal on the more serious charges. The conviction for operating under the influence was based on evidence presented during the trial. The defense's arguments about investigative flaws and evidentiary issues were influential in the outcome.
Day/Date | Witnesses & Testimony | Prosecution Position | Defense Position | Fact # |
---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1 April 22, 2025 |
Witnesses: Timothy Nuttall (Canton FD), Kerry Roberts Key Points: Nuttall found no signs of life; Roberts received "John's dead" call |
Opening: Read's admissions of intoxication & anger at O'Keefe1 | Opening: "Definition of reasonable doubt"—case lacks evidence2 | 1, 5 |
Day 2 April 23, 2025 |
Witnesses: Kerry Roberts (cont.), Peggy O'Keefe Key Points: O'Keefe's mother emotional testimony about learning of death |
Establishing timeline and emotional impact of O'Keefe's death1 | Highlighting inconsistencies in witness accounts2 | 1 |
Days 3-5 April 24-28, 2025 |
Witnesses: Trooper Guarino, Daniel Whitley (Canton FD), Ian Whiffin (Cellebrite) Key Points: Cell phone health data showing O'Keefe walking 12:11-12:30 a.m.; Google search timeline analysis |
Phone stayed in yard all night—supports car-strike theory13 | Step count shows he walked inside house14 | 6, 7 |
Days 6-8 April 29-May 1, 2025 |
Witness: Jennifer McCabe (3 days) Key Points: "I hit him, I hit him, I hit him" statement; search for O'Keefe before finding body |
McCabe is reliable witness; Read's statements are admissions of guilt25 | McCabe colluding in cover-up scheme25 | 5, 6, 15 |
Days 9-15 May 5-13, 2025 |
Witnesses: Law enforcement, digital experts, Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello Key Points: Medical examiner on O'Keefe injuries; texts with ATF Agent Higgins |
Injuries match vehicle collision pattern3 | Pattern fits assault/dog bites, not car4 | 2, 10 |
Days 16-20 May 14-20, 2025 |
Witness: Shanon Burgess (Aperture) Key Points: Previously unexamined SUV computer chip; 21-29 second clock discrepancy |
Reverse shift & 24 mph spike at 12:45 a.m. shows impact7 | Data ambiguous; analyst unqualified8 | 4, 14 |
Day 21 May 21, 2025 |
Witness: State Police trace analyst Key Points: Rice-sized plastic debris in O'Keefe's clothing matches taillight |
Physical match proves Lexus strike22 | Challenges chain of custody and evidence handling22 | 3, 12 |
Days 22-23 May 27-28, 2025 |
Witness: Dr. Judson Welcher Key Points: SUV scuff mark matches O'Keefe's hip height; injuries consistent with Lexus strike |
Expert analysis shows precise height match23 | Challenges methodology & potential bias23 | |
Day 24-25 May 29-30, 2025 |
Witnesses: Defense experts in accident reconstruction Key Points: Defense begins presenting case; challenges prosecution's timeline and evidence collection |
Cross-examination focuses on expert qualifications and methodologies | Presents alternative theories about O'Keefe's injuries and death26 | |
Days 26-27 June 3-4, 2025 |
Witnesses: Additional defense experts and character witnesses Key Points: Testimony on crime scene analysis and evidence handling |
Seeks to discredit defense theories through cross-examination | Highlights inconsistencies in police investigation and evidence collection27 | |
Day 28-29 June 10-11, 2025 |
Witness: Andrew Rentschler, defense crash reconstruction expert Key Points: Testified O'Keefe's injuries inconsistent with being struck by a vehicle26 |
Challenged expert's conclusions and methodology | Presented analysis showing no evidence taillight broke from striking O'Keefe27 | |
Day 30 June 12, 2025 |
Proceedings: Closing arguments begin Key Points: Defense rests case; both sides present final arguments to jury28,29 |
Argued Read was 'drunk, angry, and jealous' when she 'left O'Keefe to die' | Called investigation 'flawed from start' and prosecution's case 'circumstantial' | |
Day 23 May 28, 2025 |
Prosecution Rests Final Evidence: Read's statements: "What if I clipped him in the knee?" |
38 witnesses presented comprehensive case over 23 days1 | Commonwealth case lacks sufficient evidence for conviction2 | All |
Day 25 May 30, 2025 |
Witness: Matthew DiSogra (Defense expert) Key Points: No SUV techstream events triggered by collision; challenges vehicle data synchronization |
Cross-examination challenges expert methodology1 | Technical evidence contradicts collision theory4 | 4, 14 |
Days 26-27 June 3-4, 2025 |
Witnesses: Additional defense experts and character witnesses Key Points: Testimony on crime scene analysis and evidence handling |
Seeks to discredit defense theories through cross-examination | Highlights inconsistencies in police investigation and evidence collection27 | - |
Day 28-29 June 10-11, 2025 |
Witness: Andrew Rentschler, defense crash reconstruction expert Key Points: Testified O'Keefe's injuries inconsistent with being struck by a vehicle26 |
Challenged expert's conclusions and methodology | Presented analysis showing no evidence taillight broke from striking O'Keefe27 | 16, 17 |
Day 30 June 12, 2025 |
Proceedings: Closing arguments begin Key Points: Defense rests case; both sides present final arguments to jury28,29 |
Argued Read was 'drunk, angry, and jealous' when she 'left O'Keefe to die' | Called investigation 'flawed from start' and prosecution's case 'circumstantial' | 18 |
Day 31 June 13, 2025 |
Proceedings: Jury instructions and deliberations begin30 Key Points: Judge instructs jury on second-degree murder, manslaughter, and leaving scene charges |
Emphasized burden of proof is 'beyond reasonable doubt' not all doubt | This site is intended to help us explore how reasonable people, starting from different assumptions or weighing evidence differently, can reach very different conclusions about the same case. By making our reasoning explicit, we can better understand how and why viewpoints diverge—even when everyone is acting in good faith. This is an educational exploration of Bayesian reasoning, not a verdict predictor. | 19 |
References
- 1 WCVB: Karen Read retrial daily summary
- 2 Boston.com: Karen Read autopsy & cause of death
- 3 Fox News: Taillight evidence at scene
- 4 MassLive: Vehicle data & reverse shift
- 5 Court TV: Key players & witness testimony
- 6 NY Post: Google search timeline evidence
- 7 Particle News: Forensic & Digital Evidence
- 8 Boston.com: Snow-plow driver & arm injuries
- 9 Fox News: Evidence collection—leaf blower & Solo cups
- 10 MassLive: 52 calls & 8 voicemails recap
- 11 Rigth News: BAC analysis & forensic testimony
- 12 WCVB: Flirtatious texts with Higgins
- 13 Particle News: Apple Health/Waze data
- 14 Fox News: Missing sneaker & taillight shard
- 15 Time News: Surveillance video timestamp
- 16 Particle News: Peggy O’Keefe testimony
- 17 Boston.com: Relationship troubles & prosecution theory
- 18 Fox News: Digital forensics & timeline
- 19 MassLive: Flirty texts with Brian Higgins
- 20 WCVB: Evidence handling in snow
- 21 CNN: How retrial differs from first trial
- 22 Court TV: Daily retrial updates
- 23 Boston Globe: Prosecution expert testimony
- 24 Boston Herald: Complete retrial coverage
- 25 Time News: Trial timeline & evidence
- 26 Boston Globe: Defense expert testimony on injuries
- 27 Boston Globe: Taillight evidence re-examination
- 28 Boston Globe: Prosecution closing arguments
- 29 Boston Globe: Defense closing arguments
- 30 Boston Globe: Jury instructions & deliberations
More Links
Additional resources and references:
Official & News Evidence Galleries
- WCVB: Trial Exhibits & Evidence Photos
- WCVB: Karen Read Retrial Daily Summary
- Court TV: Retrial Daily Updates
- Boston.com: Karen Read Coverage
- Boston Globe: Live Trial Updates